[Guest]

You honorably defeat Rafal in combat. You walk away and let your defeated opponent sulk in their own misery.
Experience Earned : 197 (Since this attack had literally no risk of a loss, you have received half experience.)
Hospitalization Time : 18


BE A MAN AND EQUIP!

Onlines on all unequipped until they man up!

[Guest]

Random suggestion:

If you win a fight and are left with 1 hp or maybe 5 or less when you started from full can that = 5 or 10x xp? lol would almost never happen anyways but would be cool

[NastyFO]

(2009.Jul.22 04:16 AM)Howlsong Wrote:  I am now spending 3 times the amt of Nimbus so that I can attack again.

LOL... me thinks this is the point of all of this!!

GET DONATIN' PEOPLE!!

[Guest]

(2009.Jul.22 11:40 AM)xSleekx Wrote:  Random suggestion:

If you win a fight and are left with 1 hp or maybe 5 or less when you started from full can that = 5 or 10x xp? lol would almost never happen anyways but would be cool

you would be surprised at the amount of times i was about that close, anyways where was this code when i was lvling

[NastyFO]

I started this fight w/ 900 HP and got this:

You honorably defeat tonkau in combat. You walk away and let your defeated opponent sulk in their own misery.

Experience Earned : 242 (Due to the difficulty of this combat, you have received extra experience!)
Hospitalization Time : 16

I used to get 260ish for him two days ago.

[Punisher]

now this is total bs for someone i could hosp easily before

After a battle this long, you start to hear the police sirens in the distance getting close. Staying any longer will result in both of you being surrounded by cops.

Continue

he was unequipped...and i hit him for 2...stupid stupid code

[zenith]

(2009.Jul.22 11:56 AM)NastyFO Wrote:  

(2009.Jul.22 04:16 AM)Howlsong Wrote:  I am now spending 3 times the amt of Nimbus so that I can attack again.

LOL... me thinks this is the point of all of this!!

GET DONATIN' PEOPLE!!

Has nothing to do with donations. It just shows how prevalent attacking unarmed opponents was. That was the whole point of the switch. However, if players are going to intentionally unequip their items so they are worth less... perhaps losing needs to hurt more. Still going over a day of data and making tweaks.

I've had a lot of complaints, a lot of praise, and a few suggestions.

[Dingus]

I suggest....Dingus for President!

[NastyFO]

(2009.Jul.22 12:19 PM)zenith Wrote:  

(2009.Jul.22 11:56 AM)NastyFO Wrote:  

(2009.Jul.22 04:16 AM)Howlsong Wrote:  I am now spending 3 times the amt of Nimbus so that I can attack again.

LOL... me thinks this is the point of all of this!!

GET DONATIN' PEOPLE!!

Has nothing to do with donations. It just shows how prevalent attacking unarmed opponents was. That was the whole point of the switch. However, if players are going to intentionally unequip their items so they are worth less... perhaps losing needs to hurt more. Still going over a day of data and making tweaks.

I've had a lot of complaints, a lot of praise, and a few suggestions.

I was just kiddin, Zen!

[zenith]

I am thinking the best solution to the XP complaints is to make only a bonus to players who attack and almost lose. The players who don't equip lose extra XP rather than limit the XP earned for the winner.

Discuss.