2009.Aug.03, 09:17 AM
2009.Aug.03, 09:19 AM
Helmet. I'll sell a b4c for 600k
2009.Aug.03, 09:20 AM
where's the who cares option?
2009.Aug.03, 09:21 AM
Maybe, Blume, you should present the whole argument, as a whole. Not just the bare minimum, which was way under what we talked about.
SisterLynx
2009.Aug.03, 09:22 AM
B4C Helmet at $190K = saving 60k
or
B4C Armour at $700K = saving 150k or buying from Dingus saving 250k
Really need a poll to figure it out?
or
B4C Armour at $700K = saving 150k or buying from Dingus saving 250k
Really need a poll to figure it out?
2009.Aug.03, 09:23 AM
(2009.Aug.03 09:21 AM)TommiTheTaco Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe, Blume, you should present the whole argument, as a whole. Not just the bare minimum, which was way under what we talked about.
Actually, I completely disagree. It's a public poll. Let everyone form their own opinions, without knowledge of "who" they are voting for.
The bare minimum lends itself to a fair vote. What more would they need to know to form an opinion?
2009.Aug.03, 09:28 AM
But I'm not here for the bare minimum, or this topic wouldn't of came up. I'm here to see who's more right than the other.
Here's Blume's argument.
I gave him a 17% discount on the B4C armor in the past($700,000 from $850,000 is, according to him, 17%).
He gave me a 23-26% discount on the B4C helmet just now($190,000 from $250,000 is, according to him, 23-26%).
By his logic, he gave me a bigger discount because the percentage is larger.
Here's my argument.
These items aren't even in the same price range, and anywhere near 5-7% would ALMOST STILL be a bigger discount to his 23-26% discount on the helmet, based on the value of the items. That a 17% discount at $850,000 would be worth more than 23-26% at $250,000.
I met him more than half-way from my initial price of $150,000 and went to $180,000. Reasonable offer.
Here's Blume's argument.
I gave him a 17% discount on the B4C armor in the past($700,000 from $850,000 is, according to him, 17%).
He gave me a 23-26% discount on the B4C helmet just now($190,000 from $250,000 is, according to him, 23-26%).
By his logic, he gave me a bigger discount because the percentage is larger.
Here's my argument.
These items aren't even in the same price range, and anywhere near 5-7% would ALMOST STILL be a bigger discount to his 23-26% discount on the helmet, based on the value of the items. That a 17% discount at $850,000 would be worth more than 23-26% at $250,000.
I met him more than half-way from my initial price of $150,000 and went to $180,000. Reasonable offer.
2009.Aug.03, 09:30 AM
I'd still vote for Bacon
2009.Aug.03, 09:31 AM
Then bacon it is!
2009.Aug.03, 09:33 AM
(2009.Aug.03 09:28 AM)TommiTheTaco Wrote: [ -> ]I met him more than half-way from my initial price of $150,000 and went to $180,000. Reasonable offer.
Not part of the argument... The debate is 190 vs 700... as the debate was which was a bigger discount. The $ discount is irrelevant unless you are selling 2 items at the EXACT SAME PRICE.
So with your logic buying a house at 1,000,000 (sale price 1,100,000) is a better deal than buying shoes at $50 (sale price $100).