AwakenedLands Forums

but can you eat a plastic fire hat?

(2010.Apr.28 02:26 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 02:24 PM)ditallica Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 02:16 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 01:59 PM)Leopard Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 01:52 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 01:38 PM)Leopard Wrote: [ -> ]...I was out of the game for 4 months and have been back for over a year

Zen just said it was actually a 90-day banishment from what she remembers. thats def closer to the 2 months i recalled it being than the 4 months you keep imagining.

if you said 2 & I said 4 & it was actually 3
neither was more correct than the other

glad to know my activity is such an important topic for you

no....just pointing out that you lie about the length of time you were in the fed pen and try to use that excuse to explain how much more tougher you would be if not for the banishment (woe is g2).

and as far as the math goes.... 90 days is 1.5 months. so my, "closer to 2 months" is far more correct than your "4 months" lie. so its about keeping you honest, genius.

you lose again.

30 days=1 month
90 days=3 months.
that was the dumbest thing i have ever heard

you are correct. lol

---

Round 1
Marlo misses Conrad!
Conrad hits Marlo for 163 damage. Marlo resists 55 for a total of 108 damage.

Round 2
Conrad hits Marlo for 183 damage. Marlo resists 44 for a total of 139 damage.
Marlo hits Conrad for 335 damage. Conrad resists 38 for a total of 297 damage.

Round 3
Conrad misses Marlo!
Marlo misses Conrad!

Round 4
Conrad hits Marlo for 249 damage. Marlo resists 30 for a total of 219 damage.
Marlo misses Conrad!

Round 5
Conrad hits Marlo for 221 damage. Marlo resists 29 for a total of 192 damage.
Marlo hits Conrad for 221 damage. Conrad resists 99 for a total of 122 damage.

Round 6
Conrad hits Marlo for 256 damage. Marlo resists 28 for a total of 228 damage.
Marlo misses Conrad!

Round 7
Conrad hits Marlo for 195 damage. Marlo resists 35 for a total of 160 damage.
Marlo misses Conrad!

Round 8
Conrad hits Marlo for 304 damage. Marlo resists 33 for a total of 271 damage.
Marlo hits Conrad for 187 damage. Conrad resists 80 for a total of 107 damage.

Round 9
Marlo misses Conrad!
Conrad hits Marlo for 204 damage. Marlo resists 48 for a total of 156 damage.

Round 10
Marlo hits Conrad for 139 damage. Conrad resists 65 for a total of 74 damage.
Conrad hits Marlo for 267 damage. Marlo resists 30 for a total of 237 damage.

Round 11
Conrad hits Marlo for 187 damage. Marlo resists 47 for a total of 140 damage.
Marlo hits Conrad for 632 damage. Conrad resists 66 for a total of 566 damage.

Round 12
Conrad hits Marlo for 253 damage. Marlo resists 50 for a total of 203 damage.
Marlo misses Conrad!

Round 13
Conrad hits Marlo for 141 damage. Marlo resists 43 for a total of 98 damage.
Marlo misses Conrad!

Round 14
Conrad misses Marlo!
Marlo misses Conrad!

Round 15
Marlo misses Conrad!
Conrad hits Marlo for 347 damage. Marlo resists 55 for a total of 292 damage.
Conrad defeated Marlo.


You honorably defeat all combatants. You walk away and let your defeated opponents sulk in their own misery.
Experience Earned : 369
Hospitalization Time : 30

Conrad your weak sauce. I get better hits with my old gun, the HK MP6.

(2010.Apr.28 02:33 PM)w00k Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 02:04 PM)Troopermccue Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 01:58 PM)w00k Wrote: [ -> ]I can piss farther than all of you...

yea, but out your asss? that's a talent.

Yep... through a screen too.

uh...that would be cheating.

that should be "you're", Josh. im very dissapointed in you.

(2010.Apr.28 02:54 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: [ -> ]that should be "you're", Josh. im very dissapointed in you.

Yeah well at least I can crit over 350 in game.

(2010.Apr.28 02:54 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: [ -> ]that should be "you're", Josh. im very dissapointed in you.

That should be "you're", Josh. I'm very disappointed in you.

There is the grammatically correct sentence.

(2010.Apr.28 03:30 PM)ditallica Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 02:54 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: [ -> ]that should be "you're", Josh. im very dissapointed in you.

That should be "you're", Josh. I'm very disappointed in you.

There is the grammatically correct sentence.

That would work better than "There" in this case.

(2010.Apr.28 03:34 PM)johnsonhalo76 Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 03:30 PM)ditallica Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 02:54 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: [ -> ]that should be "you're", Josh. im very dissapointed in you.

That should be "you're", Josh. I'm very disappointed in you.

There is the grammatically correct sentence.

That would work better than "There" in this case.

Yes, that may be the case, but my example is correct, too. There is nothing wrong with that sentence.

(2010.Apr.28 03:34 PM)johnsonhalo76 Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 03:30 PM)ditallica Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 02:54 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: [ -> ]that should be "you're", Josh. im very dissapointed in you.

That should be "you're", Josh. I'm very disappointed in you.

There is the grammatically correct sentence.

That would work better than "There" in this case.

Words don't "work".

(2010.Apr.28 03:30 PM)ditallica Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Apr.28 02:54 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: [ -> ]that should be "you're", Josh. im very dissapointed in you.

That should be "you're", Josh. I'm very disappointed in you.

There is the grammatically correct sentence.

"There are the grammatically correct sentences", would "work" better.