[Monk]

and is this wonky change worth the effort just to apply that?

[Punisher]

its gonna negate alot of the stronger folks and all they put into the game....will provide a different level of play and more randomness for sure

[mblume]

(2010.Apr.21 10:41 AM)Punisher Wrote:  its gonna negate alot of the stronger folks and all they put into the game...

Isn't this a good thing? I mean, not negating them, but provide another challenge for those otherwise unbeatable?

[ZeonOne]

a motivation to get stronger for the strong player.

[Monk]

(2010.Apr.21 10:41 AM)Punisher Wrote:  will provide a different level of play and more randomness for sure

Is right. do we really want that or arn't we trying to just make a fight code that works and is fair. how did we stray so far off course.

[Canosoup]

If I can finally beat W00k or Pun, even with help, I'm up for it !

[Dingus]

Here is what it should be. He who has the best stats wins period!


This would work perfect and solve all problems


Thank you yes thank you!

[RenegadeJEDI]

I have been told in IM that this game has had some trouble with XP fir top tier players. I think that multiple attackers us the next logical step if they ever wish to reach the highest levels.

[Mock8800]

would be awesome to see 20 peolpe lose to pun. all at once because someone in the gang attacked him.

[Leopard]

(2010.Apr.21 12:12 PM)Mock8800 Wrote:  would be awesome to see 20 peolpe lose to pun. all at once because someone in the gang attacked him.

I would much rather see you get your nose out of Pun's bunghole