[Duchbag69]

more often than not though, whether it be by bad luck and randomness, my zerk times always seem to be on the low of end of hosp times...granted i dont zerk very often either...When my zerk time is almost as low as a leave attack time, there is obviously something, in my opinion that needs a little work....

maybe 2.5 x energy used is a little high for some people..it was just a number i found to seem fair...It's not like something small like this would make someone wanna grab 10 levels for an extra 25 minute minimum on to their zerk times...

if it stays the way it is fine im not going to complain, I would just like to see something like this changed in the game....

[Conrad1103]

(2009.Sep.24 11:46 AM)Howlsong Wrote:  well i am one of the 2 ppl who voted for 210... lol

im the other.

---

(2009.Sep.24 12:47 PM)Prophesy Wrote:  I know I'll probably get drek for my thoughts,
seems I'm one of the only people to disagree
(and post about it, instead of just voting)

granted, I don't do a ton of hosping,
could probably count on both hands the players I've hosped in 2 years of AL,
so it's not something that affects me too often,

but my thought is that the zerk hosp times are fine,
seem to be, and makes since that they're the same scale as a normal hosp attack.

I may be wrong,
but from what I understand the zerk option is there to give you added effectiveness in your attack, giving you a chance to beat someone that you would usually bite-off with, or struggle with quite a bit.

The full energy cost is for the added effectiveness in the actual attack,
not for any kind of bonus to thier hosp stay.

I can deffinately see how it'd be frustrating to spend all your energy on one attack, only to have the recipient land a good roll, and only end up in the hosp for a short time,

but unless it's a super tough opponent,
just stick to regular "Hospitalize Them"s , and only Zerk when it's a tough cookie and you need some extra pop, not to try and up a hosp stay time.

newb

[JohnnyB]

yup.. 250 minimum is fair enough!

[Conrad1103]

Zen....70% of the people that took part in the poll feel that the minimum hosp time for a zerck should be AT LEAST 120 mins (2 hours).

will you at least consider a change?

[Rafallol]

(2009.Sep.24 04:24 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote:  Zen....70% of the people that took part in the poll feel that the minimum hosp time for a zerck should be AT LEAST 180 mins (3 hours).

will you at least consider a change?

I thik you cant count

[Conrad1103]

(2009.Sep.24 04:34 PM)Rafallol Wrote:  

(2009.Sep.24 04:24 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote:  Zen....70% of the people that took part in the poll feel that the minimum hosp time for a zerck should be AT LEAST 180 mins (3 hours).

will you at least consider a change?

I thik you cant count

i meant over 70% at 120 mins - 2 hours.

edit - its up to 80% now.

[Conrad1103]

lets get back to business.

[Dingus]

No, this is another terrible idea!

[dnbrocks]

(2009.Sep.25 07:56 AM)Dingus Wrote:  No, this is another terrible idea!

+1

[Conrad1103]

(2009.Sep.25 02:25 PM)dnbrocks Wrote:  

(2009.Sep.25 07:56 AM)Dingus Wrote:  No, this is another terrible idea!

+1

you both have been outvoted.