Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Conrad1103 · 2008.Mar.15, 03:03 PM

tigersclaw69 Wrote:There isn't much point in deleting any gangs but inactive gangs. More gangs = more targets so what's there to complain abut.

make them all declarible then.

awesomo · 2008.Mar.15, 04:21 PM

Conrad1103 Wrote:
tigersclaw69 Wrote:There isn't much point in deleting any gangs but inactive gangs. More gangs = more targets so what's there to complain abut.

make them all declarible then.

already asked zenith about this one, she was against the idea saying, 'you wana milk inactives for points'

2008.Mar.15, 04:31 PM

exactly. war isn't fun if the other gang can't fight back.

2008.Mar.15, 06:15 PM

i ask again, in what way does it harm you to see a bunch of barely active gangs?

Conrad1103 · 2008.Mar.15, 07:32 PM

Kirky1992 Wrote:
Conrad1103 Wrote:
tigersclaw69 Wrote:There isn't much point in deleting any gangs but inactive gangs. More gangs = more targets so what's there to complain abut.

make them all declarible then.
already asked zenith about this one, she was against the idea saying, 'you wana milk inactives for points'

im not talking about the inactives necessarily. im talking about the one-man-gangs.

there is only 1, One-Man-Gang my friends...and he was 350lbs and fought in Mid-South Wrestling in the 1980s. other than that.. there is no such thing as a one-man gang (or two man).