Nice war, SV!
2010.Mar.23, 05:47 PM
RE: Nice war, SV!
Post: #11
(2010.Mar.23 05:37 PM)zenith Wrote:  Maybe we need an official title bout then.

the belt situation has been established. wranglers=belt...all others=shitstained dildos. thanks though...Smile

You're on a gravy train with biscuit wheels. -Ernie McCracken
2010.Mar.23, 06:10 PM
RE: Nice war, SV!
Post: #12
VS won the belt from wranglers a long time ago. If there were to be a title match it would have to be established so wranglers couldnt roll someone at 3am.
2010.Mar.23, 06:11 PM
RE: Nice war, SV!
Post: #13
(2010.Mar.23 05:40 PM)JakeBlues Wrote:  
(2010.Mar.23 05:37 PM)zenith Wrote:  Maybe we need an official title bout then.

'Bout time.

A title "belt" tag

You win against the gang that has it, and it's yours. The tag shows under your gang name in the public page, and the number of days you've been in possession of.

Keep it for a while (1 - 10 - 100 days ) and random bonuses happen to you gang (better OC's odds/results - higher hideout hits crits?!? - gp's bonuses in battles - more rounds in the turrets)


Heavyweight, Cruiserweight, lightweight.

i really like this idea.

Reaganomics! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
2010.Mar.23, 06:18 PM
RE: Nice war, SV!
Post: #14
thanks for a bit of fun that war was class
2010.Mar.23, 06:20 PM
RE: Nice war, SV!
Post: #15
(2010.Mar.23 06:10 PM)thatthingufear Wrote:  VS won the belt from wranglers a long time ago. If there were to be a title match it would have to be established so wranglers couldnt roll someone at 3am.

pfft.

(2010.Mar.23 06:11 PM)dnbrocks Wrote:  
(2010.Mar.23 05:40 PM)JakeBlues Wrote:  
(2010.Mar.23 05:37 PM)zenith Wrote:  Maybe we need an official title bout then.

'Bout time.

A title "belt" tag

You win against the gang that has it, and it's yours. The tag shows under your gang name in the public page, and the number of days you've been in possession of.

Keep it for a while (1 - 10 - 100 days ) and random bonuses happen to you gang (better OC's odds/results - higher hideout hits crits?!? - gp's bonuses in battles - more rounds in the turrets)


Heavyweight, Cruiserweight, lightweight.

i really like this idea.

off the record, so do i.
This post was last modified: 2010.Mar.23 06:20 PM by spacebird.

You're on a gravy train with biscuit wheels. -Ernie McCracken
2010.Mar.23, 06:23 PM
RE: Nice war, SV!
Post: #16
(2010.Mar.23 05:37 PM)zenith Wrote:  Maybe we need an official title bout then.

How about you don't start a contest/title/giveaway in order to cover up the issue. You banned 2 players that had the respect of the community and your own, up to this point. That requires a statement from you. It's good community PR.

That being said, Preach's idea of a belt is cool. KB for Cruiserweight Champions 2010!

Hey, do both! Multitask, admin!
2010.Mar.23, 06:23 PM
RE: Nice war, SV!
Post: #17
(2010.Mar.23 06:10 PM)thatthingufear Wrote:  VS won the belt from wranglers a long time ago. If there were to be a title match it would have to be established so wranglers couldnt roll someone at 3am.

Never been a war against VS at 3 am. Twas the other way around, me...you.

Support your local 81
┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

()()
(ºº) Biffi ----->
(__)

I own inpaces left nut. See here.
2010.Mar.23, 07:10 PM
RE: Nice war, SV!
Post: #18
(2010.Mar.23 06:23 PM)Chymere Wrote:  You banned 2 players that had the respect of the community and your own, up to this point. That requires a statement from you.

You're on a gravy train with biscuit wheels. -Ernie McCracken
2010.Mar.23, 07:29 PM
RE: Nice war, SV!
Post: #19
(2010.Mar.23 06:18 PM)jamiewhite Wrote:  thanks for a bit of fun that war was class

Where the eff are my roses?!

An den

(2010.Mar.23 07:10 PM)Troopermccue Wrote:  
(2010.Mar.23 06:23 PM)Chymere Wrote:  You banned 2 players that had the respect of the community and your own, up to this point. That requires a statement from you.
This post was last modified: 2010.Mar.23 07:30 PM by DustiWoot.

Who gives a drek.
2010.Mar.23, 07:41 PM
RE: Nice war, SV!
Post: #20
Stay on topic ple.........nm

I'll make you a star in the back seat of my car.