Inactive
2012.Apr.15, 05:04 PM
RE: Inactive
Post: #4
(2012.Apr.15 09:53 AM)CrimsonFox Wrote:  That's even possible? How would two inactive gangs even be able to declare on each other, being inactive and all? Or am I missing something here...?

if one of the gangs had an active member that declared then left i guess. other then that the war would have to have been declared before members went inactive.

give her the bowling ball grip, two in the pink and one in the stink.

all cats are grey in the dark.


Messages In This Thread
Inactive - tables18 - 2012.Apr.15, 09:48 AM
RE: Inactive - CrimsonFox - 2012.Apr.15, 09:53 AM
RE: Inactive - tables18 - 2012.Apr.15, 09:58 AM
RE: Inactive - GlennQuagmire - 2012.Apr.15 05:04 PM
RE: Inactive - Duchbag69 - 2012.Apr.15, 07:06 PM
RE: Inactive - GlennQuagmire - 2012.Apr.15, 07:25 PM
RE: Inactive - filthymick - 2012.Apr.17, 09:07 AM
RE: Inactive - CrimsonFox - 2012.Apr.17, 09:10 AM
RE: Inactive - Duchbag69 - 2012.Apr.17, 02:59 PM