[oddjob]

matt5250 Wrote:yup, I do agree that innactives should be removed from the pantheon

why? I don't think they should. Just because they are inactive is no guarantee that they are never coming back.

And if they have the goods to be up there then why shouldnt they be?

Its easier to see your own progress if you are able to see yourself pass them in ranking.

Plus, there isnt a single category on the pantheon where an inactive player will stay there permanently. In every category active players have the advantage.

(the one exception might be gang loyalty... but who even cares about that one)

As to the first question:

abysmalpoptart Wrote:anyone agree that the pantheon should include more recent stuff? for instance, some of the top players are even inactive. the only real "recent" section is attacks/defends in past 24 and i guess technically referrals. what about most points gained in past 24 or month? most active? i think that might be some cool things to implement

Yes, many people agree. In fact a more extensive thread already exists covering this subject. some maybe should get added to panthenon, others to game stats? i donno

http://www.awakenedlands.com/forums/view...game+stats