Elders Bashing
2007.Jan.05, 02:32 PM
 
Post: #37
so, this may not work in all cases as I was thinking of something that would make this specific war more even, but I think it would. If you gave each gang an item that would make one person in that gang un-attackable It would even out more gang wars I think. my reasoning is that most gang wars are decided by who has the best single player. in this case if chris wasnt there, sarge and I are fairly equal but thats not always the case. anyways, if each team had one play that was not attackable that would help online time contribute more to who wins a gang war. My thought was this, if you have two gangs with a ringer (usually a gang has one but its not always by level as chris is obviously a ringer for the elders) and gang A's ringer is stronger than gang B's ringer, gang A will win assuming they aren't completely innactive. if the ringers are un-attackable, the war would be more influenced by online time. personally I think it might work, its obviously not realistic but hey, its a game. if anyone has any opinions on this, whether they think it would work and why, likes, dislikes etc. please post.
Thread Closed


Messages In This Thread
Elders Bashing - Eaglefreak - 2007.Jan.03, 07:34 PM
[] - matt5250 - 2007.Jan.03, 08:30 PM
[] - Eaglefreak - 2007.Jan.03, 08:51 PM
[] - Nightrain - 2007.Jan.03, 09:10 PM
[] - oddjob - 2007.Jan.03, 09:20 PM
[] - Nightrain - 2007.Jan.04, 04:15 PM
[] - Nightrain - 2007.Jan.04, 05:13 PM
[] - Nightrain - 2007.Jan.04, 07:16 PM
[] - Chris Mangano - 2007.Jan.04, 07:25 PM
[] - Jack Daniels - 2007.Jan.04, 07:28 PM
[] - Nightrain - 2007.Jan.04, 08:21 PM
[] - zenith - 2007.Jan.05, 12:38 AM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.05, 02:01 AM
[] - brythompson - 2007.Jan.05, 03:01 AM
[] - Druchii - 2007.Jan.05, 03:32 AM
[] - Thor - 2007.Jan.05, 05:14 AM
[] - brythompson - 2007.Jan.05, 05:18 AM
[] - hawk187 - 2007.Jan.05, 05:56 AM
[] - Druchii - 2007.Jan.05, 06:08 AM
[] - Druchii - 2007.Jan.05, 06:11 AM
[] - brythompson - 2007.Jan.05, 06:41 AM
[] - Druchii - 2007.Jan.05, 06:54 AM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.05, 07:44 AM
[] - matt5250 - 2007.Jan.05, 08:30 AM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.05, 08:35 AM
[] - brythompson - 2007.Jan.05, 08:58 AM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.05, 09:03 AM
[] - Nightrain - 2007.Jan.05, 09:12 AM
[] - brythompson - 2007.Jan.05, 09:58 AM
[] - Nightrain - 2007.Jan.05, 10:48 AM
[] - Chris Mangano - 2007.Jan.05, 10:53 AM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.05, 10:58 AM
[] - Rafallol - 2007.Jan.05, 01:22 PM
[] - zenith - 2007.Jan.05, 01:37 PM
[] - brythompson - 2007.Jan.05, 01:54 PM
[] - matt5250 - 2007.Jan.05, 01:56 PM
[] - matt5250 - 2007.Jan.05 02:32 PM
[] - Sam I Am - 2007.Jan.05, 02:43 PM
[] - Eaglefreak - 2007.Jan.05, 03:03 PM
[] - Eaglefreak - 2007.Jan.05, 03:24 PM
[] - matt5250 - 2007.Jan.05, 03:25 PM
[] - Rafallol - 2007.Jan.05, 03:41 PM
[] - Rafallol - 2007.Jan.05, 03:58 PM
[] - Chris Mangano - 2007.Jan.05, 04:09 PM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.05, 04:14 PM
[] - Rafallol - 2007.Jan.05, 04:19 PM
[] - brythompson - 2007.Jan.05, 04:42 PM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.05, 04:42 PM
[] - Chris Mangano - 2007.Jan.05, 05:22 PM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.05, 05:27 PM
[] - Nightrain - 2007.Jan.05, 05:28 PM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.05, 05:31 PM
[] - matt5250 - 2007.Jan.05, 06:45 PM
[] - Rafallol - 2007.Jan.05, 07:27 PM
[] - matt5250 - 2007.Jan.05, 07:38 PM
[] - Rafallol - 2007.Jan.05, 08:08 PM
[] - supergirl260 - 2007.Jan.05, 09:57 PM
[] - Lostangel - 2007.Jan.06, 03:25 AM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.06, 03:26 AM
[] - Druchii - 2007.Jan.06, 04:29 AM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.06, 04:47 AM
[] - brythompson - 2007.Jan.06, 06:41 AM
[] - Rafallol - 2007.Jan.06, 06:49 AM
[] - Rafallol - 2007.Jan.06, 07:02 AM
[] - brythompson - 2007.Jan.06, 09:04 AM
[] - matt5250 - 2007.Jan.06, 07:17 PM
[] - Jack Daniels - 2007.Jan.06, 07:26 PM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.06, 07:32 PM
[] - Jack Daniels - 2007.Jan.06, 07:38 PM
[] - LordSkie - 2007.Jan.06, 07:39 PM
[] - zenith - 2007.Jan.06, 10:26 PM