[iceman2020]

I'm just saying use some logic. Your argument is completely worthless because it has nothing to do with this topic. It would actually BENEFIT donors more if implemented that are also in gangs, just like you and me.

Let me lay it out for you in simple terms; this is a simplistic model.

Example:

Scenario 1:

I'm a donor in a gang. with the new rule implemented I get 10 more trains/week. To make it easy, let's say I gain 10 points per train as a donor.

Scenario 2:

I'm not a donor in a gang. with the new rule implemented I get 10 more trains/week. To make it easy, let's say I gain 7.5 points per train as a non-donor.

Scenario 3:

I'm a donor not in a gang. with the new rule implemented I get nothing in addition to what I already have.

Scenario 4:

I'm not a donor and not in a gang. with the new rule implemented I get nothing in addition to what I already have.

Results:

Scenario 1: +100 development points
Scenario 2: +75 development points
Scenario 3: +0
Scenario 4: +0



THEREFORE, it is not a matter of donor vs non-donor but rather gang member vs non-gang member.

Logic; it's a wonderful thing.