(2010.Jan.08 08:40 PM)cheetah Wrote: (2010.Jan.08 08:29 PM)JakeBlues Wrote: (2010.Jan.08 08:25 PM)cheetah Wrote: I just feel jealously, that no other gang can post that they've done the same. OMG, look at their levels (no offense to VS, actually a compliment), so they can do it but you can't....
No offense Cheetah, I'm just posting to discuss the subject.
Even tough I am not taking back the fact that they succeeded, they still would not have the same consequences other gangs could live through for winning against you guys.
I'm talking weeks of wars, most of the time losing since you guys are really strong, therefor cutting back on training / criming / warring time.
Much more expensive, but not for VS.
They won yes. But with a discount on the price to pay for it.
Umm wrong!
Yes Diss was the last gang to defeat us.
I was not online for it, but from what I hear, it was an extremely clean war!
No hosps, etc. Ask Weebs if you want, this is what I was told of it by both sides!
You are confusins hosping wars, with gang wars.
Diss's win over us was a gang war, and still--props to them!
Hosping wars, have no rules. Which has absolutely nothing to do with this thread!
I was not talking hosp wars at all.
I lived war with SVs back when I was in Valhalla, and I can clearly recall, after beating you once at somepoint for some reason ( I think we just used a good timing but I can't remember it was a long time ago) that for a week or so after that, you guys kept attacking us.
It was clean, no hosp. But it was almost non stop, therefor cutting on ressources and gains.
ANd it is allright, I mean, it brings the heat on the gang beating you guys, and you want to show you can strike back, and it's all fair.
But, anyway, I'll leave the thread if you still think I make no sense. Not that important.
