[Accipender]

(2009.Dec.22 12:44 PM)Druchii Wrote:  

(2009.Dec.22 12:34 AM)cheetah Wrote:  At which point Dru thinks he makes a humorous remark, although out of line for a mod--if you're gonna close it fine, but making fun of the people you're modding makes you a mod not worthy of respect!

I closed the thread, not at a humorous remark, but because it was only the first post that was on topic. But wait, I may have mistaken, let me find out what I wrote.

"I think it's only the first post that's on topic."

Which leads me to assume that indeed I wrote the locking reason for the thread, and not a humorous punch at the players involved in it.

If you really want to know why I locked it, and not just split the posts out of it, then I can tell you as well. Because it was only the first post that was ontopic, it was less time and energy consuming to lock it, rather then split every other post out of it. And if the OP want he can make a brand new thread.

And I believe that you in the closing thread also made this statement.

"So mods are working overtime, yet this pointless dribble goes on for pages?

Makes perfect sense!"

So you wanted it locked, but when it gets locked you rage?

I think that the problem is that your post was ambiguous. I, like Cheetah, apparently, read it as that the last post was the first one that was on topic, and, thus, the only one. This seemed like a humorous remark to close a thread. That being said, I also see what you meant.