Inactives idea
2009.Aug.09, 05:32 PM
RE: Inactives idea
Post: #6
(2009.Aug.09 05:29 PM)BlackHand Wrote:  
(2009.Aug.09 05:22 PM)Bloodlust Wrote:  True, but they are having to pay to return to where they were when they left.

I like the idea and this is a weak argument.

I'm for the idea too, but I'm stating it from their point of veiw. If they are moved then shouldn't they have free travel back to where they were when they left?

When you protect someone you don't let them die, when you guard you don't let them cut you, and when you strike you kill!


Messages In This Thread
Inactives idea - g2o2d4wp - 2009.Aug.09, 05:18 PM
RE: Inactives idea - Bloodlust - 2009.Aug.09, 05:19 PM
RE: Inactives idea - g2o2d4wp - 2009.Aug.09, 05:20 PM
RE: Inactives idea - Bloodlust - 2009.Aug.09, 05:22 PM
RE: Inactives idea - BlackHand - 2009.Aug.09, 05:29 PM
RE: Inactives idea - Bloodlust - 2009.Aug.09 05:32 PM
RE: Inactives idea - TommiTheTaco - 2009.Aug.09, 06:17 PM
RE: Inactives idea - chance - 2009.Aug.09, 07:14 PM
RE: Inactives idea - g2o2d4wp - 2009.Aug.09, 05:39 PM
RE: Inactives idea - thatthingufear - 2009.Aug.09, 05:45 PM
RE: Inactives idea - superdude - 2009.Aug.09, 06:03 PM
RE: Inactives idea - Fallout - 2009.Aug.09, 06:24 PM
RE: Inactives idea - infinite93 - 2009.Aug.09, 07:03 PM
RE: Inactives idea - TommiTheTaco - 2009.Aug.09, 07:47 PM
RE: Inactives idea - thatthingufear - 2009.Aug.09, 09:05 PM
RE: Inactives idea - Howlsong - 2009.Aug.09, 09:21 PM
RE: Inactives idea - hardasgranite - 2009.Aug.09, 11:32 PM
RE: Inactives idea - Thor - 2009.Aug.10, 07:31 AM
RE: Inactives idea - g2o2d4wp - 2009.Aug.10, 11:49 AM
RE: Inactives idea - Dingus - 2009.Aug.10, 07:36 AM
RE: Inactives idea - Conrad1103 - 2009.Aug.10, 10:07 AM