A change to wars that would be friggin SWEET!
2009.Apr.12, 09:41 AM
RE: A change to wars that would be friggin SWEET!
Post: #15
(2009.Apr.12 07:05 AM)ZhuSeth Wrote:  Shouldn't randomness be the first on the list?

(2009.Apr.12 06:42 AM)Punisher Wrote:  dont forget...low hits can also be attributed to RANDOMNESS, hideout hardening, peacetime hardening, randomness, ap defending, and wartime hardening....plus randomness

This work for you Zhuy?

Whatever leniency I extended to you and your comrades before, may have been in error. If you persist in halting our course, we will burn your pathetic fleet down to the last man.


Messages In This Thread
A change to wars that would be friggin SWEET! - shadowrain - 2009.Apr.11, 07:48 AM
RE: A change to wars that would be friggin SWEET! - ZhuSeth - 2009.Apr.11, 12:44 PM
RE: A change to wars that would be friggin SWEET! - renkotsu - 2009.Apr.11, 01:28 PM
RE: A change to wars that would be friggin SWEET! - ZhuSeth - 2009.Apr.11, 01:39 PM
RE: A change to wars that would be friggin SWEET! - ZhuSeth - 2009.Apr.11, 03:56 PM
RE: A change to wars that would be friggin SWEET! - ZhuSeth - 2009.Apr.11, 03:37 PM
RE: A change to wars that would be friggin SWEET! - shadowrain - 2009.Apr.12, 01:14 PM
RE: A change to wars that would be friggin SWEET! - Accipender - 2009.Apr.12 09:41 AM
RE: A change to wars that would be friggin SWEET! - ZhuSeth - 2009.Apr.12, 07:05 AM