[Guest]

I just want to add something here. It's nearly impossible for a non donator to take part in these pvp wars. Even myself who donates a small amount every couple months is having a tough time affording pvp wars.
I believe lowering the costs of war will help bring more people into that aspect of the game and in the long run will be better for the bottom line.

[Guest]

wars are entirely too expensive. the whole economy of this game is fucked

[Jolabent]

I have to agree stims are expensive, but then I have to asked the question, why when a gang declares are they choosing brutalize or hospitalize rather than combat attack. I understand when one gang is at war and another declares on them, it is to save the hideout and win both wars, but I don't understand why some do it all the time?

[Guest]

b/c stims are expensive. if you hospitalize someone you take them out of the game for the time being.

[Jolabent]

playajam Wrote:b/c stims are expensive. if you hospitalize someone you take them out of the game for the time being.

Now that makes perfect sense, thank you

[Guest]

Jolabent Wrote:I have to agree stims are expensive, but then I have to asked the question, why when a gang declares are they choosing brutalize or hospitalize rather than combat attack. I understand when one gang is at war and another declares on them, it is to save the hideout and win both wars, but I don't understand why some do it all the time?

I'm only going to speak for myself here, but the reason why i will sometimes choose hospitalize or brutalize is because if you are trying to attack someone who is much stronger than you, it helps knock down their health more so than a standard combat attack. Doing that will then give you the opportunity to attack again and possibly get a good amount of gang points for someone you wouldn't be able to beat. It's not always affective, but sometimes it is...

[Moriarty]

this is something I have called for in the past, I concur

[Guest]

ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1