AwakenedLands Forums

And you believed that

(2010.Oct.06 08:23 AM)klaw16 Wrote: [ -> ]So, let's just say - hypothetically, of course - that a gang continues to lose members, while their rival (and initially, much smaller) gang continues to grow to where more and more slots need to be added...

What sort of deduction could be made?
Would this mean that the smaller (initially) of the two is on the rise, while the larger is facing endangerment?
Does it mean that the larger gang is just so strong that the smaller members get weeded out too easily?
Does it show a lack in leadership skills for one or the other?

Please, feel free to post your thoughts.
Inquiring minds want to know.

who cares

(2010.Oct.07 03:51 PM)Troopermccue Wrote: [ -> ]camel clutch?

we've got bush.......... (for dramitic effect).........

(2010.Oct.07 04:28 PM)thehustler Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Oct.07 03:51 PM)Troopermccue Wrote: [ -> ]camel clutch?

we've got bush.......... (for dramitic effect).........

too bad biff got banned............(for drama effect)..................................................................................cosa nostra just upgraded to supersonik

whats dramitic?

i miss cheetah

(2010.Oct.07 05:03 PM)Troopermccue Wrote: [ -> ]i miss cheetah

she is jealous that general got such a heart filled letter and she did not.

(2010.Oct.07 04:39 PM)Troopermccue Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Oct.07 04:28 PM)thehustler Wrote: [ -> ]

(2010.Oct.07 03:51 PM)Troopermccue Wrote: [ -> ]camel clutch?

we've got bush.......... (for dramitic effect).........

too bad biff got banned............(for drama effect)..................................................................................cosa nostra just upgraded to supersonik

this is life changing stuff dude. it could just be the bill and ted effect.