She was talking about when we used to be able to over encumber our selfs.
I know for a fact I fight much differently at .55 enc than at .16 enc.
(2010.Feb.22 04:16 PM)Brugada Wrote: [ -> ]She was talking about when we used to be able to over encumber our selfs.
I know for a fact I fight much differently at .55 enc than at .16 enc.
I don't know exactly what you mean, Zen says encumbrance does not affect the attack code if it is under one. How can you fight differently @ .55 and .16?
Zen isnt known to be the clearest with her answers either.
Im saying one is more nimble and able to dodge more and possibly go more rounds and still win if you took your armor, helmet and belt off.
With new skill implementations encumbrance matters now.
i cant remember where i saw it, but zen said that it does matter, so every .01 encrumberence you can take off makes a difference.
and your linked thread was 6 years old lol...
(2010.Feb.22 05:55 PM)shadow55 Wrote: [ -> ]i cant remember where i saw it, but zen said that it does matter, so every .01 encrumberence you can take off makes a difference.
and your linked thread was 6 years old lol...
6 years? The game hasn't even been around 4 years.
lmao, im tired. leave me alone!
From
this thread, Zen clearly stated encumbrance matters for the combat evasion skill.
(2009.Jun.27 05:17 PM)zenith Wrote: [ -> ]The official answer for evasion is the lower the encumbrance the better. You will not get the same benefit of evasion if you have a .90 encumbrance compared to a .50.
thanks for clearing that up. So encumbrance affects your evasion ability, good to know.
(2010.Feb.21 06:37 PM)Erka44 Wrote: [ -> ]Are shields actually worth the money you pay for them?
Ask OnwardTowardtheGlory. He, if I recall correctly, is a strong advocate of sheilds, and seems to have a pretty solid character.