[infinite93]

(2009.Sep.25 03:15 PM)Dingus Wrote:  Moriarty, I appreciate your long post and I won't paste it here. You found an advantage (exploit), you then took advantage of it. All your mumbo jumbo gets trumped by this one little FACT! Games Rules violated FACT!

I will not post on this topic again!

I'm not Moriarty, I will just talk to others (like G2, he seems a reasonable guy) if you don't.

Your argument fails because you are working from a false premise. As stated in the message immediately above this one. It isn't an exploit. It is a known behavior of the code that the admins have elected not to re-mediate.
This case is in no way different than the old encumbrance issue. People used it all the time to deter attackers, but until it was used in the extreme (I think it was bren and Custie, if I recall correctly) admin chose to do nothing about it.

If they can find a way to remove this behavior from the game without impacting performance and choose to do so, fine. But since the case precedent for multiple attacks is to not correct the issue (remove jail time/xp/hosp time) when it occurs, I would argue that admin has chosen to leave this feature and not determined it to be a 'bug' or 'exploit'.