[Budweiser]

(2010.Oct.15 05:28 PM)Jolabent Wrote:  I completely agree, if you get one warning and it stops for a long period of time, then yes, I don't think that you should be on the second offense. This was set for constant repeat offenders.

One swear word might just get edited with no warning, or maybe even just a normal warning of 20% for one day, I think it is set for which is not excessive. But some of the threads that have been removed have been a whole entire paragraph of every 3rd or 4th word. I edited one paragraph that had over 30 words. Did they get a warning? Sure did.

This warning is currently for coarse language filter work arounds, which I am sure everyone knows has gone overboard.

What we are trying to come up with here, is guidelines so everyone knows and it is public knowledge, like people have requested and also suggestions on how you would like the mods to handle things in uniformity.

What criteria will you be using to determine the details. I used a year as an example in my post however what is a long time in your book. How long would one have to go without a warning to keep from being banned. These are all things that need to be determined obviously having the mod use there best judgement isn't working bc if it was this thread wouldn't be here.


What truly defines a repeat offender. I've been banned twice however they've both been in the last six weeks and I've been playing the game for 600+ days do you consider past track record or just whats happened recently.