Poll: Would you use the option
yes
No
[Show Results]
Note: This is a public poll, other users will be able to see what you voted for.
Attack options
2010.Mar.06, 12:31 PM
RE: Attack options
Post: #6
i kind of like this idea. However, I think one other thing would be great to add to it. Remove the zerk option as it is now and just use the zerk options rambo listed. If you think about it, this idea doesn't really change the way the zerk works in the game, as the result will be the same, the weaker player uses all energy to put the stronger player in the hospital, it only changes what the user gets out of the zerk. The way the zerk works right now allows a weaker player to put a stronger player in the hosp. but for an extremely long time. Instead, why not have the ability to take out a stronger player at the cost of all your energy but only put the player in the hosp. for a short amount of time. If the normal zerk option in the game is removed, then it would only allow a stronger player to put a weaker player in the hosp. for a long time, which in my opinion makes more sense anyway.

The only issue I see with it is the zerk/gang battle option being abused when it comes to getting 5-10 point gang battles from weaker players hitting stronger players.


Messages In This Thread
Attack options - JohnRambo - 2010.Mar.06, 10:07 AM
RE: Attack options - bconrad56 - 2010.Mar.06, 10:10 AM
RE: Attack options - bebopcrew420 - 2010.Mar.06, 11:12 AM
RE: Attack options - Chymere - 2010.Mar.06, 11:16 AM
RE: Attack options - jamiewhite - 2010.Mar.06, 11:18 AM
RE: Attack options - HalfGodHercules - 2010.Mar.06 12:31 PM
RE: Attack options - TommiTheTaco - 2010.Mar.06, 01:48 PM
RE: Attack options - Duchbag69 - 2010.Mar.06, 02:01 PM
RE: Attack options - Accipender - 2010.Mar.08, 06:01 PM
RE: Attack options - dnbrocks - 2010.Mar.06, 07:04 PM
RE: Attack options - thatthingufear - 2010.Mar.06, 08:58 PM
RE: Attack options - McCule - 2010.Mar.06, 10:04 PM
RE: Attack options - Fallout - 2010.Mar.06, 10:55 PM
RE: Attack options - 2asandab - 2010.Mar.07, 12:07 AM
RE: Attack options - Troopermccue - 2010.Mar.07, 09:26 AM
RE: Attack options - Duchbag69 - 2010.Mar.07, 01:46 PM
RE: Attack options - peteycrack - 2010.Mar.07, 02:47 PM
RE: Attack options - Mock8800 - 2010.Mar.07, 07:21 AM
RE: Attack options - Accipender - 2010.Mar.07, 08:41 AM
RE: Attack options - bebopcrew420 - 2010.Mar.07, 08:42 AM
RE: Attack options - JohnRambo - 2010.Mar.07, 02:53 PM
RE: Attack options - peteycrack - 2010.Mar.07, 02:56 PM
RE: Attack options - JohnRambo - 2010.Mar.07, 03:04 PM
RE: Attack options - peteycrack - 2010.Mar.07, 03:09 PM
RE: Attack options - thatthingufear - 2010.Mar.07, 03:04 PM
RE: Attack options - TommiTheTaco - 2010.Mar.07, 03:12 PM
RE: Attack options - JohnRambo - 2010.Mar.08, 05:26 PM
RE: Attack options - bebopcrew420 - 2010.Mar.08, 05:28 PM
RE: Attack options - Chymere - 2010.Mar.08, 05:30 PM
RE: Attack options - JohnRambo - 2010.Mar.08, 05:53 PM
RE: Attack options - dnbrocks - 2010.Mar.08, 07:59 PM
RE: Attack options - JohnRambo - 2010.Mar.08, 06:06 PM
RE: Attack options - Accipender - 2010.Mar.08, 06:11 PM
RE: Attack options - johnsonhalo76 - 2010.Mar.08, 06:12 PM
RE: Attack options - JohnRambo - 2010.Mar.08, 06:34 PM
RE: Attack options - Duchbag69 - 2010.Mar.08, 07:36 PM
RE: Attack options - BlackHand - 2010.Mar.08, 08:23 PM