This has to be a record
2010.Feb.28, 01:37 PM
RE: This has to be a record
Post: #36
(2010.Feb.28 01:36 PM)Moriarty Wrote:  What exactly is the record you were claiming? The usual thread noise has masked the original purpose of the thread, again

Most resisted in one fight. He bolded it in the OP.

Whatever leniency I extended to you and your comrades before, may have been in error. If you persist in halting our course, we will burn your pathetic fleet down to the last man.


Messages In This Thread
This has to be a record - JohnRambo - 2010.Feb.27, 02:28 PM
RE: This has to be a record - bconrad56 - 2010.Feb.27, 02:32 PM
RE: This has to be a record - Brugada - 2010.Feb.27, 02:36 PM
RE: This has to be a record - JohnRambo - 2010.Feb.27, 02:39 PM
RE: This has to be a record - TommiTheTaco - 2010.Feb.27, 02:48 PM
RE: This has to be a record - JohnRambo - 2010.Feb.27, 02:50 PM
RE: This has to be a record - mblume - 2010.Feb.27, 03:09 PM
RE: This has to be a record - bebopcrew420 - 2010.Feb.27, 03:57 PM
RE: This has to be a record - peteycrack - 2010.Feb.28, 12:58 AM
RE: This has to be a record - bebopcrew420 - 2010.Feb.28, 09:34 AM
RE: This has to be a record - JohnRambo - 2010.Feb.28, 09:46 AM
RE: This has to be a record - bebopcrew420 - 2010.Feb.28, 10:01 AM
RE: This has to be a record - JohnRambo - 2010.Feb.28, 10:04 AM
RE: This has to be a record - TommiTheTaco - 2010.Feb.28, 12:34 PM
RE: This has to be a record - Brugada - 2010.Feb.28, 10:08 AM
RE: This has to be a record - JohnRambo - 2010.Feb.28, 10:18 AM
RE: This has to be a record - Brugada - 2010.Feb.28, 10:18 AM
RE: This has to be a record - peteycrack - 2010.Feb.28, 10:23 AM
RE: This has to be a record - JohnRambo - 2010.Feb.28, 10:24 AM
RE: This has to be a record - peteycrack - 2010.Feb.28, 10:26 AM
RE: This has to be a record - bebopcrew420 - 2010.Feb.28, 10:27 AM
RE: This has to be a record - Troopermccue - 2010.Feb.28, 10:27 AM
RE: This has to be a record - JohnRambo - 2010.Feb.28, 10:41 AM
RE: This has to be a record - Troopermccue - 2010.Feb.28, 10:44 AM
RE: This has to be a record - bebopcrew420 - 2010.Feb.28, 10:45 AM
RE: This has to be a record - JohnRambo - 2010.Feb.28, 10:48 AM
RE: This has to be a record - Troopermccue - 2010.Feb.28, 10:51 AM
RE: This has to be a record - bebopcrew420 - 2010.Feb.28, 10:57 AM
RE: This has to be a record - peteycrack - 2010.Feb.28, 11:06 AM
RE: This has to be a record - JohnRambo - 2010.Feb.28, 11:06 AM
RE: This has to be a record - bebopcrew420 - 2010.Feb.28, 01:29 PM
RE: This has to be a record - Leopard - 2010.Feb.28, 01:31 PM
RE: This has to be a record - Moriarty - 2010.Feb.28, 01:36 PM
RE: This has to be a record - Accipender - 2010.Feb.28 01:37 PM
RE: This has to be a record - Moriarty - 2010.Feb.28, 01:39 PM
RE: This has to be a record - JohnRambo - 2010.Feb.28, 01:41 PM
RE: This has to be a record - bebopcrew420 - 2010.Feb.28, 01:50 PM
RE: This has to be a record - JohnRambo - 2010.Feb.28, 01:53 PM
RE: This has to be a record - Moriarty - 2010.Feb.28, 01:45 PM