[spacebird]

(2010.Jan.14 03:54 PM)thatthingufear Wrote:  

(2010.Jan.14 01:08 PM)JohnRambo Wrote:  Ok my understanding of a "gang jump" attack is 3 v 1 i.e 3 members of a gang versus 1 guy on his own.

So, this being the case and me and my buddies go looking for someone to fill in. We use presious GP's to organise this and as such are kinda miffed that we had to do that, so now were really mad and are gonna bite,kick,scream and shoot till the mofo is hosp'd.

What we are not gonna do is say, your turn first mate, you do your best against him and if you get slaughtered we will flick a coin to see who goes next.

What we will do, is all 3 of us at once, kick the drek out of him.

Round 1

weebay hits Rj for 565
Rj hits weebay for 800
Jr hits rj for 300
Breeze hits rj for 300

So, being the case that the toughest guy i.e weebs takes the initial and subsequent counter attacks, myself and breeze have free rain to hit him without taking a shot in anger.

weebs so far has 565 damage
me 0
breeze 0

Rj has 1400

...................................................................................

Should the fight turn bad and weebs hits critical, then it should be the turn of the next highest player to initiate the next round, i.e absorbing the counter himself and protecting his injured mate.

Think of it as tag team wrestling, you know the 3 v 1's weve seen all the time. One guy almost pinned, counters, rushes to the ropes and tags the next, fresh guy in.

This actually makes sense. Did your kids come up with this idea for you?

no it doesn't!!


breeze would do way more damage than biff.