+- AwakenedLands Forums (http://forums.awakenedlands.com)
+-- Forum: Awakened Lands - General (/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: Should players be able to become admins? (/thread-11266.html)
RE: Should players be able to become admins? - ShadowKid - 2010.Mar.17 06:39 AM
i would love to be admin.(Cue morons barking on about my punctuation,grammer etc)
(2010.Mar.16 09:43 PM)PhisheVA Wrote: The position will require one to have a grasp of the English language.
This eliminates rambo and shadowkid.
Ha ha ha ha.
RE: Should players be able to become admins? - Moriarty - 2010.Mar.17 06:57 AM
(2010.Mar.17 06:39 AM)ShadowKid Wrote: (Cue morons barking on about my punctuation,grammer etc)
Space after a comma please SK
RE: Should players be able to become admins? - 2asandab - 2010.Mar.17 07:42 AM
(2010.Mar.16 10:59 PM)PhisheVA Wrote: DeFine what player/admins responsibilities are and then have this discussion.
+1 I don't really understand what these "admins" responsibilities would be, the only time I have ever mailed Zen was when I signed up the guy who lives below that I share my router w/. I mailed Zen so she would not have any multi questions/and possibly remove the same ip send item block, she still hasn't responded. Other than vetting possible multis and settling harrassment issues (block their mails) what would an "admin" do?
How could these tasks really allow for bias that wasn't painfully obvious?
The reason why Forum Mods get crap is because IMO, they over step their authority, edit posts that circumvent the swear filter, its not hard, I feel I could easily be a forum mod or in-game admin w/o any problems.
If you couldn't play your character, why would you log into the game.
lol, Crap_ is filtered, thats insane . . . only word crazier to filter "Jesus".
RE: Should players be able to become admins? - klaw16 - 2010.Mar.17 07:57 AM
Maybe a U.N.-type group, with representatives from across the board (being established members and of established gangs.)?
RE: Should players be able to become admins? - DebbiePinson - 2010.Mar.17 08:19 AM
No on voting
RE: Should players be able to become admins? - Conrad1103 - 2010.Mar.17 08:33 AM
(2010.Mar.16 10:59 PM)PhisheVA Wrote: DeFine what player/admins responsibilities are and then have this discussion.
exactly.
i accept my nomination, btw.
oh....and if any X pat is chosen, me and my gang of multis quit.
that is all.
RE: Should players be able to become admins? - DebbiePinson - 2010.Mar.17 08:34 AM
(2010.Mar.17 08:33 AM)Conrad1103 Wrote:(2010.Mar.16 10:59 PM)PhisheVA Wrote: DeFine what player/admins responsibilities are and then have this discussion.
exactly.
i accept my nomination, btw.
oh....and if any X pat is chosen, me and my gang of multis quit.
that is all.
what are you fox news?
RE: Should players be able to become admins? - klaw16 - 2010.Mar.17 10:46 AM
(2010.Mar.17 08:33 AM)Conrad1103 Wrote:(2010.Mar.16 10:59 PM)PhisheVA Wrote: DeFine what player/admins responsibilities are and then have this discussion.
exactly.
i accept my nomination, btw.
oh....and if any X pat is chosen, me and my gang of multis quit.
that is all.
Move to Canadia, Nancy.
RE: Should players be able to become admins? - Leopard - 2010.Mar.17 11:03 AM
(2010.Mar.17 08:33 AM)Conrad1103 Wrote:(2010.Mar.16 10:59 PM)PhisheVA Wrote: DeFine what player/admins responsibilities are and then have this discussion.
exactly.
i accept my nomination, btw.
oh....and if any X pat is chosen, me and my gang of multis quit.
that is all.
You just gave a lot of players reason to hope for an X Pat to be chosen.
I therefore welcome the position
RE: Should players be able to become admins? - Conrad1103 - 2010.Mar.17 11:16 AM
(2010.Mar.17 11:03 AM)Leopard Wrote:(2010.Mar.17 08:33 AM)Conrad1103 Wrote:(2010.Mar.16 10:59 PM)PhisheVA Wrote: DeFine what player/admins responsibilities are and then have this discussion.
exactly.
i accept my nomination, btw.
oh....and if any X pat is chosen, me and my gang of multis quit.
that is all.
You just gave a lot of players reason to hope for an X Pat to be chosen.
I therefore welcome the position
you are actaully wrong. as usual.