![]() |
bye bye man - Printable Version +- AwakenedLands Forums (http://forums.awakenedlands.com) +-- Forum: Awakened Lands - General (/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: General Discussion (/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: bye bye man (/thread-5196.html) |
- shadowinc - 2008.Oct.22 07:44 PM well i hate for anybody to leave as i said before, and the only two people that can answer why he was fed jailed is zen and err,or by anybody who talks to him outside the game , - iceman2020 - 2008.Oct.22 07:45 PM mudpies Wrote:"Once access is back, they will be on probation until April 30th, 2009. During this time there will be a "no tolerance" outlook to their actions. There will be no warnings, no requests to keep in line, and no leniency. Any disrespect shown to any staff members, forum moderators, or other players in general are included. This no tolerance outlook applies to all forms of in-game communication. I want a positive contribution to the community." That was a contract a lawyer would make. Those terms can take so many different interpretations: verbal and nonverbal. If, and I place emphasis on if, the ban was based on hospitalizations, it would fall under those terms. - Ushanewnewba - 2008.Oct.22 07:46 PM mudpies Wrote:"The following must be agreed to by Blackjeep, DebbiePinson, and g2o2d4wp in its entirety to get access back. I will require an email from each with this mail included, their acknowledgment of what needs to be done, and their agreement. Do you know for a fact he was not disrespectful to staff member, forum moderator, or other players in general? Did he give a positive contribution to the community? - chance - 2008.Oct.22 07:49 PM Omg, I cant believe I am saying this, But I am backing Ush on this discussion. - shadowinc - 2008.Oct.22 08:00 PM chance Wrote:Omg, I cant believe I am saying this, But I am backing Ush on this discussion. yes you are, but it is ok, it helps all to understand hat could and could not be the reason - Dingus - 2008.Oct.22 08:00 PM This isnt a case of me standing up for g2. This is a case of him being fed'd at certain players requests and or complaints. Believe it or not this is the truth! - Ushanewnewba - 2008.Oct.22 08:01 PM I doubt it was for attacks. Many players have done the same type of drek and have not been banned. If hosping was a part of it, it was a very small part I am sure. He attacked for 3 weeks straight ALL hosps... I think it would have been a ban 2 weeks ago if it were solely for attacks on online players. - BadLuck - 2008.Oct.22 08:02 PM Dingus Wrote:This isnt a case of me standing up for g2. This is a case of him being fed'd at certain players requests and or complaints. Believe it or not this is the truth! And what makes you so certain thats the reason? If he sent a vulgar mail, or is consistantly harrassing someone via mail, then yes I guess I could see that being the case. However, how do you know thats the exact reason? Do you have proof that we don't? If so, please present this proof for us to read ![]() - Dingus - 2008.Oct.22 08:05 PM Beating Dead horse! - Ushanewnewba - 2008.Oct.22 08:05 PM I feel hosping is negative in-game discussion ![]() |