New or old system? - Printable Version +- AwakenedLands Forums (http://forums.awakenedlands.com) +-- Forum: Awakened Lands - General (/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: General Discussion (/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: New or old system? (/thread-1189.html) |
- matt5250 - 2007.Apr.07 12:07 PM zenith Wrote:You forgot that levels are extremely important for your crime success rate. so then why does criming take experience seriously (as it should) and combat doesn't? that doesn't make sense. - zenith - 2007.Apr.07 04:44 PM matt5250 Wrote:so then why does criming take experience seriously (as it should) and combat doesn't? that doesn't make sense. Level matters in the combat code, contrary to what some think. - Rafallol - 2007.Apr.07 06:22 PM if they maters it is so small that it is not perceptible - matt5250 - 2007.Apr.07 07:48 PM zenith Wrote:matt5250 Wrote:so then why does criming take experience seriously (as it should) and combat doesn't? that doesn't make sense. I know it matters, but it's obviously not significant. - Thor - 2007.Apr.07 08:30 PM Don't wanna sound rude but you guys are starting to sound like you want levels to matter to a point where a lvl 30 would never ever lose to a lvl 26-27, no matters what each stats are. That wouldn't be right if you ask me. - matt5250 - 2007.Apr.07 10:01 PM no, I want levels to matter to a point where a lvl 30 wouldnt lose to a lvl 22 unless the lvl 22 had at the very least double his stats - Rafallol - 2007.Apr.08 12:21 AM acctually i was 33 when i lost to 22 :? - TheGeek - 2007.Apr.08 12:30 AM maybe if levels had the additional effect of a critical strike multiplier... say plus X to critical strike chance per lvl above your target or attacker. that way its not overpowered, but at the same time can be advantageous. - Chris Mangano - 2007.Apr.09 11:47 AM If you're level 33 losing to a level 22 maybe you need to actually train your stats. Just a thought. - matt5250 - 2007.Apr.09 11:53 AM at the rate it's going chris all us lvl 34's will be losing to a lvl 27 or 28 in the not too distant future. |