![]() |
Do we really want multiple person attacks - Printable Version +- AwakenedLands Forums (http://forums.awakenedlands.com) +-- Forum: Awakened Lands - General (/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: General Discussion (/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: Do we really want multiple person attacks (/thread-11819.html) |
RE: Do we really want multiple person attacks - Duchbag69 - 2010.Apr.21 03:01 PM Monk man, i think it would be cool, just imagine 3 kids thinking all of them together are stronger than you, you land a nasty crit on each of them, they get a long hosp for stupidity and you probably a hefty gang point pull from it since its a multi attacks... personally, i like it, i find i get pretty bored during wars and if there are people in the opposing gang online that i know have no shot on there own to beat me i usually dont touch them and wait for someone in my gang a little weaker to put them away because they may get a gang point out of it, now if there are a few of them online, with the option to multi attack me, i'd take the initiative to put them away before they get the chance to gang up on me.. it adds more strategy, which is what this game needs i think... RE: Do we really want multiple person attacks - Echothrice - 2010.Apr.21 03:02 PM Additionally, if they're hitting you for 1 damage each time.... I don't care if there's 20 of em, they won't do jack to you. RE: Do we really want multiple person attacks - Monk - 2010.Apr.21 03:04 PM or does it take away from strategy. I believe so. If it were made like all the people need full energy or something to coordinate it. I'm not sure but I don't think I like the sound of it and most importantly Dingus doesn't like it. RE: Do we really want multiple person attacks - Echothrice - 2010.Apr.21 03:07 PM I'd love to see gang v. gang combat. Remember that the winning side does NOT end up in the hospital, just at 1 hp if they die in the fight. Perhaps some weapons should work slightly better in multi-person combat, hitting multiple peeps for a small portion of a single-person attack. RE: Do we really want multiple person attacks - Monk - 2010.Apr.21 03:11 PM (2010.Apr.21 03:07 PM)Echothrice Wrote: I'd love to see gang v. gang combat. Remember that the winning side does NOT end up in the hospital, just at 1 hp if they die in the fight. OR we could just keep it normal and not get overly complicated. RE: Do we really want multiple person attacks - Duchbag69 - 2010.Apr.21 03:13 PM Monk, did you forget to take your upper today, you seem to be on the downers RE: Do we really want multiple person attacks - w00k - 2010.Apr.21 03:14 PM (2010.Apr.21 03:13 PM)Duchbag69 Wrote: Monk, did you forget to take your upper today, you seem to be on the downers I have some "adult ADD" pills that may help with that... RE: Do we really want multiple person attacks - Monk - 2010.Apr.21 03:14 PM Naw man just think its crazy to change such a huge part of the game. Its just putting those strong people at an advantage and the weak ones at an even bigger disadvantage than before. RE: Do we really want multiple person attacks - w00k - 2010.Apr.21 03:16 PM It's not even fully phased in yet, duder! RE: Do we really want multiple person attacks - Monk - 2010.Apr.21 03:17 PM (2010.Apr.21 03:16 PM)w00k Wrote: It's not even fully phased in yet, duder! What were we talking about again? |