Pantheon of Infamy - Printable Version +- AwakenedLands Forums (http://forums.awakenedlands.com) +-- Forum: Awakened Lands - General (/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: General Discussion (/forum-10.html) +--- Thread: Pantheon of Infamy (/thread-7183.html) |
RE: Pantheon of Infamy - badmanbren - 2009.May.31 04:37 AM Guys wtf, keep on the topic please! Personally I think if you have a problem with someone you should let us all shout it out in the forums. RE: Pantheon of Infamy - Dingus - 2009.May.31 05:49 PM Dr. Phil told me you are always better to express yourself in a public forum. Holding it all in is murder! RE: Pantheon of Infamy - Lucky666 - 2009.May.31 07:11 PM aqua... just crawl under a rock and die already RE: Pantheon of Infamy - JakeBlues - 2009.May.31 07:12 PM He'll be mod soon enough. RE: Pantheon of Infamy - abysmalpoptart - 2009.May.31 08:00 PM my opinion: career pantheon gives people a sense of what direction people are going. so do the stats rankings. so adding the skills portion wouldnt be telling too much of a story, just the specific weapons. i.e. i already know you're a ranged using athletic champion, rafal, but what weapon are you specifically using? since it matters SO much, since all the armor is the SAME, and dex/res doesnt really change vs a melee or a ranged user. so... whatever! if it matters so much to some of you to keep your weapons a super secret, then how about make the skills pantheon as such: combat skill pantheon military skill pantheon armor skill pantheon and it could be based upon your highest skill level in any of them RE: Pantheon of Infamy - JakeBlues - 2009.May.31 08:41 PM (2009.May.31 08:00 PM)abysmalpoptart Wrote: if it matters so much to some of you to keep your weapons a super secret, then how about make the skills pantheon as such: Cause then, some would cry because of the fact that they would be 3rd or 4th rank in each skill pantheon when they could be the first, the top pokeskill master, in there own specific weapon category, and to show there enormous genitelias. Edited to make sense, but I leave genitelias written like that RE: Pantheon of Infamy - Accipender - 2009.May.31 08:43 PM (2009.May.31 08:41 PM)Gornikel Wrote:(2009.May.31 08:00 PM)abysmalpoptart Wrote: if it matters so much to some of you to keep your weapons a super secret, then how about make the skills pantheon as such: I'm sorry, but this makes no sense. And the plural of genitals is genitalia. RE: Pantheon of Infamy - Chymere - 2009.May.31 08:47 PM I'm sorry, but genitals and genitalia are synonyms, not the same word. I'll give you that Preach spells like a French dude, but not that the plural form of genital(s) is genitalia. RE: Pantheon of Infamy - Accipender - 2009.May.31 08:54 PM (2009.May.31 08:47 PM)Chymere Wrote: I'm sorry, but genitals and genitalia are synonyms, not the same word. Are you sure? I thought that genitals referred specifically to a single pair, while genitalia referred to multiple. Either way, we are in agreement that the pluralization is certainly not "genitelias", correct? RE: Pantheon of Infamy - JakeBlues - 2009.May.31 08:54 PM Would make a great band name. |