AwakenedLands Forums
Inactives idea - Printable Version

+- AwakenedLands Forums (http://forums.awakenedlands.com)
+-- Forum: Awakened Lands - General (/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: Inactives idea (/thread-8374.html)

Pages: 1 2 3


RE: Inactives idea - Fallout - 2009.Aug.09 06:24 PM

There are already more than enough targets in DD already I don't see the need to add more.

Nearly all the districts besides DD are underused already why discourage their use further by moving all inactives to DD?.


RE: Inactives idea - infinite93 - 2009.Aug.09 07:03 PM

And don't forget the community outcry at 'messing with characters' when w00k was armed. I think the General community consensus is to leave characters alone when they are abandoned/fed'd/retired/etc.
I would love to be able to take shots at an armed w00k/Pullo/etc at low levels so that I can say 'I did it at level x', but after the problems caused by the 'arm the inactive players' idea, I really don't see any idea that involves admins performing any action on players gaining traction.


RE: Inactives idea - chance - 2009.Aug.09 07:14 PM

(2009.Aug.09 06:17 PM)TommiTheTaco Wrote:  
(2009.Aug.09 05:29 PM)BlackHand Wrote:  
(2009.Aug.09 05:22 PM)Bloodlust Wrote:  True, but they are having to pay to return to where they were when they left.

I like the idea and this is a weak argument.

Not really. w00k logged on to unequip his weapons. I think he'd want to stay where he's at, no matter what the deal..

However, a thought to this idea; Move them to DD as a temp for their inactivity, and, as soon as they come back, the temp move is reverted back into its original position.
I asked him to move there because of the lack of targets there. I think they should stay and not be moved.


RE: Inactives idea - TommiTheTaco - 2009.Aug.09 07:47 PM

I wouldn't want people moved around, either..They went there for a reason, but that's a suggestion. Nothing more.


RE: Inactives idea - CrazyFoley - 2009.Aug.09 09:05 PM

Pullo is armed in case anyone hadnt noticed.


RE: Inactives idea - Howl - 2009.Aug.09 09:21 PM

(2009.Aug.09 09:05 PM)thatthingufear Wrote:  Pullo is armed in case anyone hadnt noticed.

Really? kool



I think that since Retirement District is gone would be nice if the ppl in there started popping up.
Its gone and they're gone... it shouldnt make a hoot in hell where tf they end up... maybe put em in top district they could be.


RE: Inactives idea - BrokenGlass - 2009.Aug.09 11:32 PM

Don't move them...........


RE: Inactives idea - Thor - 2009.Aug.10 07:31 AM

if anything, they should be moved to the highest district their level would let them!! Why move a level 40 in DD, he belongs at the beach!

p.s. While we're on the sunject, I demand a correction in NPC locations. Remove that lvl 43 npc from arcology and put in a real lvl 50!


RE: Inactives idea - Dingus - 2009.Aug.10 07:36 AM

I like the idea of making them available in all districts all the time...

Just sayin......


RE: Inactives idea - Conrad1103 - 2009.Aug.10 10:07 AM

i agree with post 11 and 18. whats next? having someone click the mouse for you? laziness.