+- AwakenedLands Forums (http://forums.awakenedlands.com)
+-- Forum: Game & Forum Assistance (/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Game Assistance (/forum-12.html)
+--- Thread: Encumbrance Rate (/thread-19823.html)
RE: Encumbrance Rate - filthymick - 2017.Oct.10 09:57 AM
Maybe he wouldn't have ignored your answer if you would said exclusively what he wanted to hear lol
RE: Encumbrance Rate - SuperDave - 2017.Oct.10 10:47 AM
My question was so clear even a bind person could see,it's not about a answer I want to hear just a informed reasonable response.
RE: Encumbrance Rate - S2pmarine - 2017.Oct.10 01:41 PM
(2017.Oct.10 10:47 AM)SuperDave Wrote: My question was so clear even a bind person could see,it's not about a answer I want to hear just a informed reasonable response.
The informed response was encumberance rate doesnt affect anything unless it is >1 no matter what you believe.
RE: Encumbrance Rate - SuperDave - 2017.Oct.10 01:48 PM
Fools you can't defy evidence to the contrary.
RE: Encumbrance Rate - filthymick - 2017.Oct.10 10:21 PM
I hate to be the guy that agrees with Super Dave, but I've kind of noticed that less than one income Birds makes a difference sometimes also.
It seems a little convenient to just have it be a coincidence that I hit a lot more frequently when I don't have my really heavy belt on.
And I know Zenith said that it doesn't affect anything unless it's greater than one. However Zenith also said they were going to be more updates just saying
RE: Encumbrance Rate - SuperDave - 2018.Mar.01 01:10 PM
(2017.Oct.10 10:21 PM)filthymick Wrote: I hate to be the guy that agrees with Super Dave, but I've kind of noticed that less than one income Birds makes a difference sometimes also.
It seems a little convenient to just have it be a coincidence that I hit a lot more frequently when I don't have my really heavy belt on.
And I know Zenith said that it doesn't affect anything unless it's greater than one. However Zenith also said they were going to be more updates just saying
Finally a acknowledgement(Albeit reluctantly)that I was correct all along & the h8ters just don't want to admit since I'm perceived as being arrogant and anti-social or whatevs L0Ling@teh n00bs that have been PWN'd by their own stupidity,ignorance & public displayed limited intellectual capacity
RE: Encumbrance Rate - Maccleod - 2018.Mar.02 09:21 AM
(2018.Mar.01 01:10 PM)SuperDave Wrote:(2017.Oct.10 10:21 PM)filthymick Wrote: I hate to be the guy that agrees with Super Dave, but I've kind of noticed that less than one income Birds makes a difference sometimes also.
It seems a little convenient to just have it be a coincidence that I hit a lot more frequently when I don't have my really heavy belt on.
And I know Zenith said that it doesn't affect anything unless it's greater than one. However Zenith also said they were going to be more updates just saying
I'm a stupid Noob who asks for help all the time but think I know better when the answer doesn't suit me
Fixed
RE: Encumbrance Rate - johnsonhalo76 - 2018.Mar.03 12:45 AM
lol. that said i feel like i've noticed a difference in defences when i have my belt in storage vs on me and dead. i've had a fairly large sample size to judge by lately too
RE: Encumbrance Rate - filthymick - 2018.Mar.03 01:48 PM
Elaborate
RE: Encumbrance Rate - CrazyFoley - 2018.Mar.03 04:46 PM
I’ve noticed it to. My belt takes my above .500 and when it’s dead and equipped I tend to lose against people I beat when it’s charged or it’s not equipped.