+- AwakenedLands Forums (http://forums.awakenedlands.com)
+-- Forum: Awakened Lands - General (/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (/forum-10.html)
+--- Thread: New Shotty-Discuss (/thread-11745.html)
RE: New Shotty-Discuss - ditallica - 2010.Apr.28 03:54 PM
(2010.Apr.28 03:52 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 03:30 PM)ditallica Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 02:54 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: that should be "you're", Josh. im very dissapointed in you.
That should be "you're", Josh. I'm very disappointed in you.
There is the grammatically correct sentence.
"There are the grammatically correct sentences", would "work" better.
You are retarded.
RE: New Shotty-Discuss - johnsonhalo76 - 2010.Apr.28 03:55 PM
(2010.Apr.28 03:37 PM)Joshiwa Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 03:34 PM)johnsonhalo76 Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 03:30 PM)ditallica Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 02:54 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: that should be "you're", Josh. im very dissapointed in you.
That should be "you're", Josh. I'm very disappointed in you.
There is the grammatically correct sentence.
That would work better than "There" in this case.
Words don't "work".
my AP booklet must be lying to me then... BURN IT!!!
RE: New Shotty-Discuss - Duchbag69 - 2010.Apr.28 03:57 PM
what is a book?
RE: New Shotty-Discuss - Conrad1103 - 2010.Apr.28 04:01 PM
(2010.Apr.28 03:54 PM)ditallica Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 03:52 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 03:30 PM)ditallica Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 02:54 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: that should be "you're", Josh. im very dissapointed in you.
That should be "you're", Josh. I'm very disappointed in you.
There is the grammatically correct sentence.
"There are the grammatically correct sentences", would "work" better.
You are retarded.
no, you are.
RE: New Shotty-Discuss - ditallica - 2010.Apr.28 04:03 PM
(2010.Apr.28 04:01 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 03:54 PM)ditallica Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 03:52 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 03:30 PM)ditallica Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 02:54 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: that should be "you're", Josh. im very dissapointed in you.
That should be "you're", Josh. I'm very disappointed in you.
There is the grammatically correct sentence.
"There are the grammatically correct sentences", would "work" better.
You are retarded.
no, you are.
You are forgetting to capitalize the first letter of your sentences.
RE: New Shotty-Discuss - Conrad1103 - 2010.Apr.28 04:14 PM
(2010.Apr.28 04:03 PM)ditallica Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 04:01 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 03:54 PM)ditallica Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 03:52 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 03:30 PM)ditallica Wrote:(2010.Apr.28 02:54 PM)Conrad1103 Wrote: that should be "you're", Josh. im very dissapointed in you.
That should be "you're", Josh. I'm very disappointed in you.
There is the grammatically correct sentence.
"There are the grammatically correct sentences", would "work" better.
You are retarded.
no, you are.
You are forgetting to capitalize the first letter of your sentences.
i didnt forget. i did it on purpose. im lazy and not a homo.
RE: New Shotty-Discuss - Punisher - 2010.Apr.28 04:18 PM
bottom line the storm cant get the crits the hvs can....
the storm can do slightly more total damage if you make it to the next round assuming your opponent doesnt kill you first...
the storm does hit higher in pillow fights.....
the storm cost alot to get lower hits than all other weapons in its class...
the hvs actually performs better for me even doing more damage to the most powerful player in the game axel...
the storm needs to be the max hitter and the highest avg....since game inception we were told shotguns were the best in overall damage from crits...this gun doesnt cut the mustard
please adjust this weapon zen or i would like to take advantage of that 30 day money back guarantee
RE: New Shotty-Discuss - spacebird - 2010.Apr.28 04:34 PM
pretty strange...but then again there have been a lot of strange things going on with the new additions. i'm sure it will be adjusted if it really doesn't do what it was designed to.
have any shotty users tried to compare the other new shotgun to the one you guys are referring to?? it would be interesting to see how that one stacks up. and if the one you guys are using is just coded bad.
RE: New Shotty-Discuss - Conrad1103 - 2010.Apr.28 04:42 PM
(2010.Apr.28 04:34 PM)Troopermccue Wrote: pretty strange...but then again there have been a lot of strange things going on with the new additions. i'm sure it will be adjusted if it really doesn't do what it was designed to.
have any shotty users tried to compare the other new shotgun to the one you guys are referring to?? it would be interesting to see how that one stacks up. and if the one you guys are using is just coded bad.
im comparing 5 diff shotguns....but not that one. i will if someone sends me one.
RE: New Shotty-Discuss - cheetah - 2010.Apr.28 05:02 PM
(2010.Apr.28 02:38 PM)Punisher Wrote: but can you eat a plastic fire hat?
That night is to never be spoken of again!