Poll: Did she ruin Diss & X ?
Yep
Nope
[Show Results]
 
AlphaLyrae [34091] Ruined 2 gangs ?
2010.Apr.07, 11:26 AM
RE: AlphaLyrae [34091] Ruined 2 gangs ?
Post: #161
I bet Dusti could deep throat a Kielbasa.



Just sayin!
2010.Apr.07, 11:28 AM
RE: AlphaLyrae [34091] Ruined 2 gangs ?
Post: #162
(2010.Apr.07 11:26 AM)Dingus Wrote:  I bet Dusti could deep throat a Kielbasa.



Just sayin!

You are mistaking me with your mom!


Just sayin!

Who gives a drek.
2010.Apr.07, 11:29 AM
RE: AlphaLyrae [34091] Ruined 2 gangs ?
Post: #163
(2010.Apr.07 10:24 AM)DustiWoot Wrote:  HOw about we all get drunk. I know I'd feel better. Razz

Started rallying the troops for HH over an hour ago!
2010.Apr.07, 11:35 AM
RE: AlphaLyrae [34091] Ruined 2 gangs ?
Post: #164
(2010.Apr.07 11:13 AM)snorkelbill Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 10:45 AM)Kamyarkool Wrote:  Erm, good woman, what if you only have one computer, OR you have a sibling that wants to play this game but with their own account. if they start one on the computer your currently using for your account would that be considered a multi?

Last time I checked, she wasn't a sir. And that was fairly recently.

No, multiple people using one computer does not a multi make.

One user using multiple accounts is the definition of a multi.

there we go, problem solved Smile | sorry deja~(that last part wasnt for you snork.)
This post was last modified: 2010.Apr.07 11:36 AM by Kamyarkool.
2010.Apr.07, 11:38 AM
RE: AlphaLyrae [34091] Ruined 2 gangs ?
Post: #165
(2010.Apr.07 11:35 AM)Kamyarkool Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 11:13 AM)snorkelbill Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 10:45 AM)Kamyarkool Wrote:  Erm, good woman, what if you only have one computer, OR you have a sibling that wants to play this game but with their own account. if they start one on the computer your currently using for your account would that be considered a multi?

Last time I checked, she wasn't a sir. And that was fairly recently.

No, multiple people using one computer does not a multi make.

One user using multiple accounts is the definition of a multi.

there we go, problem solved Smile | sorry deja~(that last part wasnt for you snork.)

Who's multi are you is the question I have?

9:42 pm
New! WilliamR (aka Punisher) attacked you and lost.


3:07 am
New! Howl attacked you and lost.
8:53 pm Conrad attacked you and lost.
2010.Apr.07, 11:38 AM
RE: AlphaLyrae [34091] Ruined 2 gangs ?
Post: #166
(2010.Apr.07 11:28 AM)DustiWoot Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 11:26 AM)Dingus Wrote:  I bet Dusti could deep throat a Kielbasa.



Just sayin!

You are mistaking me with your mom!


Just sayin!

Zing!
2010.Apr.07, 11:39 AM
RE: AlphaLyrae [34091] Ruined 2 gangs ?
Post: #167
(2010.Apr.07 11:38 AM)Leopard Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 11:35 AM)Kamyarkool Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 11:13 AM)snorkelbill Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 10:45 AM)Kamyarkool Wrote:  Erm, good woman, what if you only have one computer, OR you have a sibling that wants to play this game but with their own account. if they start one on the computer your currently using for your account would that be considered a multi?

Last time I checked, she wasn't a sir. And that was fairly recently.

No, multiple people using one computer does not a multi make.

One user using multiple accounts is the definition of a multi.

there we go, problem solved Smile | sorry deja~(that last part wasnt for you snork.)

Who's multi are you is the question I have?

you mean he's not yours?

let's play Auction Tycoon 3: Diablo Edition
(._.) ~ ︵ ┻━┻
2010.Apr.07, 11:40 AM
RE: AlphaLyrae [34091] Ruined 2 gangs ?
Post: #168
(2010.Apr.07 11:20 AM)Troopermccue Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 11:13 AM)snorkelbill Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 10:45 AM)Kamyarkool Wrote:  Erm, good sir, what if you only have one computer, OR you have a sibling that wants to play this game but with their own account. if they start one on the computer your currently using for your account would that be considered a multi?

Last time I checked, she wasn't a sir. And that was fairly recently.

No, multiple people using one computer does not a multi make.

One user using multiple accounts is the definition of a multi.

i don't believe you...can i check too?

O.o

"Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today"
2010.Apr.07, 11:40 AM
RE: AlphaLyrae [34091] Ruined 2 gangs ?
Post: #169
(2010.Apr.07 11:39 AM)johnsonhalo76 Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 11:38 AM)Leopard Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 11:35 AM)Kamyarkool Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 11:13 AM)snorkelbill Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 10:45 AM)Kamyarkool Wrote:  Erm, good woman, what if you only have one computer, OR you have a sibling that wants to play this game but with their own account. if they start one on the computer your currently using for your account would that be considered a multi?

Last time I checked, she wasn't a sir. And that was fairly recently.

No, multiple people using one computer does not a multi make.

One user using multiple accounts is the definition of a multi.

there we go, problem solved Smile | sorry deja~(that last part wasnt for you snork.)

Who's multi are you is the question I have?

you mean he's not yours?

I can't afford one

9:42 pm
New! WilliamR (aka Punisher) attacked you and lost.


3:07 am
New! Howl attacked you and lost.
8:53 pm Conrad attacked you and lost.
2010.Apr.07, 11:41 AM
RE: AlphaLyrae [34091] Ruined 2 gangs ?
Post: #170
(2010.Apr.07 11:39 AM)johnsonhalo76 Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 11:38 AM)Leopard Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 11:35 AM)Kamyarkool Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 11:13 AM)snorkelbill Wrote:  
(2010.Apr.07 10:45 AM)Kamyarkool Wrote:  Erm, good woman, what if you only have one computer, OR you have a sibling that wants to play this game but with their own account. if they start one on the computer your currently using for your account would that be considered a multi?

Last time I checked, she wasn't a sir. And that was fairly recently.

No, multiple people using one computer does not a multi make.

One user using multiple accounts is the definition of a multi.

there we go, problem solved Smile | sorry deja~(that last part wasnt for you snork.)

Who's multi are you is the question I have?

you mean he's not yours?

Could be creative misdirection.