Weebay
2009.Jun.03, 03:29 PM
This I'm sure has to have been mentioned at some point, but I don't feel like looking.
The trade in values of our weapons is so insanely low that it makes me wonder if Broyles, Ares and others are subsidiary companies of GM! You take a worse bath on your weapons than you do trading in a GM product!!!!
Obviously we have the option to trade our weapon and take a huge hit on it, or we can sell privately for a negotiated deal. Why is there no option to trade it in at the store when purchasing a new weapon? The trade in value seems to resemble a situation where you need cash fast and don't have the time to haggle, so you just take the cash and accept your loss. The stores however should offer us more money for our weapons, being that they would then resell them, of course their price would be contingent on you purchasing a new weapon at that time.
Of course we could always just introduce a program that would entail the leasing of weapons with the option to buy at the end.
The trade in values of our weapons is so insanely low that it makes me wonder if Broyles, Ares and others are subsidiary companies of GM! You take a worse bath on your weapons than you do trading in a GM product!!!!
Obviously we have the option to trade our weapon and take a huge hit on it, or we can sell privately for a negotiated deal. Why is there no option to trade it in at the store when purchasing a new weapon? The trade in value seems to resemble a situation where you need cash fast and don't have the time to haggle, so you just take the cash and accept your loss. The stores however should offer us more money for our weapons, being that they would then resell them, of course their price would be contingent on you purchasing a new weapon at that time.
Of course we could always just introduce a program that would entail the leasing of weapons with the option to buy at the end.