Lostangel
2006.Jul.31, 03:29 PM
Greetings,
I have heard from a couple of people about the pattern of my attacks. I wanted our community to know who/why I attack the way I do...
I only attack when my happiness bar is less than full (after jailtime or training), and my energy bar is full, or will be on next tick.
I find the highest level person that I believe I can beat who is offline and in the same area I am. Assuming I win, I always leave them. I do this so I can attack them again, and in case they come online (Nobody like long hospital stays when they first log on).
This assumes that my gang is not in a war with someone, in which case I will attack online.
I had previously agreed to lay off some people because they were attacked too much, but I have decided that this is dumb. I will not lay off attacking someone offline unless they want to pay protection money. Why should I accept less experience for my action points, not to mention that someone further down the foodchain would then feel my wrath as well as people lower level than me?
I expect to be attacked when I am offline (and I am, quite often). I have never complained about being attacked when offline. I would complain should I get hospitalized instead of left, IF it actually affected me. Also, if I am online during a war, all is fair.
I have heard from a couple of people about the pattern of my attacks. I wanted our community to know who/why I attack the way I do...
I only attack when my happiness bar is less than full (after jailtime or training), and my energy bar is full, or will be on next tick.
I find the highest level person that I believe I can beat who is offline and in the same area I am. Assuming I win, I always leave them. I do this so I can attack them again, and in case they come online (Nobody like long hospital stays when they first log on).
This assumes that my gang is not in a war with someone, in which case I will attack online.
I had previously agreed to lay off some people because they were attacked too much, but I have decided that this is dumb. I will not lay off attacking someone offline unless they want to pay protection money. Why should I accept less experience for my action points, not to mention that someone further down the foodchain would then feel my wrath as well as people lower level than me?
I expect to be attacked when I am offline (and I am, quite often). I have never complained about being attacked when offline. I would complain should I get hospitalized instead of left, IF it actually affected me. Also, if I am online during a war, all is fair.